Frequency Is Not Enough: The Indirect Role of Perceived GenAI Trustworthiness in Employees' GenAI-Related Work Well-Being

Authors

  • Sarah Rasyidah Nur Hakim Telkom University
  • Astadi Pangarso Telkom University
  • Putu Nina Madiawati Telkom University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v5i10.9

Keywords:

Generative Artificial Intelligence, Trustworthiness, Work Well-Being, Frequency of Use

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is increasingly used in workplace activities, but usage frequency alone may not explain employees’ work experience. This study examines whether perceived GenAI trustworthiness mediates the relationship between GenAI use frequency and GenAI-related work well-being among Indonesian employees. Using a quantitative cross-sectional survey of 400 GenAI-using employees, data were analyzed with PLS-SEM and 5,000 bootstrap resamples. Frequency of GenAI use was positively associated with perceived GenAI trustworthiness (β = 0.280, p < .001), while trustworthiness was strongly associated with work well-being (β = 0.911, p < .001). The direct association between frequency and well-being was not significant (β = 0.037, p = .061), whereas the indirect effect was significant (β = 0.255, 95% CI [0.181, 0.326]). The findings indicate an indirect-only mediation pattern and highlight the importance of employees’ evaluations of GenAI beyond usage intensity.

References

Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822–848.

Dietz, G., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2006). Measuring trust inside organisations: A review of and appraisal of current research and recommendations for future research. Journal of Management, 32(6), 557–577.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage.

Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.

Martzoukou, K., Kostagiolas, P., Lavranos, C., Lauterbach, T., & Fulton, C. (2022). A study of university law students' self-perceived digital competences. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 54(4), 751–769.

Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2024). SmartPLS 4. SmartPLS GmbH.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.

Schoorman, F. D., Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (2007). An integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 344–354.

Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., Jr., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206.

Published

2026-10-29

How to Cite

Hakim, S. R. N., Pangarso, A., & Madiawati, P. N. (2026). Frequency Is Not Enough: The Indirect Role of Perceived GenAI Trustworthiness in Employees’ GenAI-Related Work Well-Being. East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 5(10), 4207–4222. https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v5i10.9