Digital Scaffolding in Science Education: A Systematic Review

Authors

  • Muhammad Yunus Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Islawati Islawati Universitas Negeri Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v5i10.4

Keywords:

Adaptivity, Chemistry education, Digital scaffolding, Science education, Systematic review

Abstract

This study aimed to synthesize the characteristics, implementation, use, adaptivity, and effectiveness of digital scaffolding in science education. A systematic literature review was conducted using the Scopus database and search terms related to digital scaffolding, science learning, technology-enhanced scaffolding, scientific inquiry, and online learning. The results show that digital scaffolding has been implemented through prompts, hints, feedback, digital journals, argumentation tools, search guidance, and adaptive systems based on learner modelling. Its effectiveness was associated not only with the availability of technological support, but also with the alignment of scaffolds with learners’ needs, learners’ attention to and actual use of the support provided, social interaction, task characteristics, design quality, and the timing of assistance. Overall, the findings indicate that digital scaffolding should be understood as a multidimensional and process-oriented support system in which technological and human assistance interact to respond to learners’ emerging needs. This review provides a conceptual basis for the design and investigation of adaptive scaffolding in future science and chemistry education research.

References

Basu, S., Biswas, G., & Kinnebrew, J. S. (2017). Learner modeling for adaptive scaffolding in a Computational Thinking-based science learning environment. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-017-9187-0.

Belland, B. R., Weiss, D. M., Kim, N. J., Piland, J., & Gu, J. (2018). An examination of credit recovery students’ use of computer-based scaffolding in a problem-based, scientific inquiry unit. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9872-9.

Deep, A., Murthy, S., & Bhat, J. (2020). Geneticus Investigatio: A technology-enhanced learning environment for scaffolding complex learning in genetics. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 15, 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-020-00145-5.

Johnson, E. K. (2018). Waves: Scaffolding self-regulated learning to teach science in a whole-body educational game. Journal of Science Education and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9753-1.

Shin, S., Brush, T. A., & Glazewski, K. D. (2020). Examining the hard, peer, and teacher scaffolding framework in inquiry-based technology-enhanced learning environments: Impact on academic achievement and group performance. Educational Technology Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09763-8.

Ustunel, H. H., & Tokel, S. T. (2017). Distributed scaffolding: Synergy in technology-enhanced learning environments. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-017-9299-y.

van Dijk, A. M., & Lazonder, A. W. (2013). Scaffolding students’ use of learner-generated content in a technology-enhanced inquiry learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2013.834828.

Published

2026-10-29

How to Cite

Yunus, M., & Islawati, I. (2026). Digital Scaffolding in Science Education: A Systematic Review. East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 5(10), 4169–4186. https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v5i10.4