Strengthening the Understanding of the Village Community on the Administrative Area of Kasturian Village, North Ternate District, Ternate City
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v5i10.19Keywords:
PKM, Administrative Area Boundaries, Community Understanding, Kasturian Village, ParticipationAbstract
This community service activity aims to strengthen public understanding and awareness of the administrative boundaries of Kasturian Village, North Ternate District, Ternate City. The activity involved 30 participants with a participatory-educational approach. Evaluation was carried out using questionnaires before and after the activity based on five indicators, then analyzed quantitatively descriptively. The results showed that the average percentage of community understanding and awareness increased from 54.88% to 87.32%, with an increase of 32.44 percentage points. The highest increase was found in the indicator of awareness of reporting regional boundary problems, which was 36 percentage points. These results showed positive changes after the education was implemented.
References
Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Ternate. (2020). Kecamatan Ternate Utara dalam angka 2020. BPS Kota Ternate. https://web-api.bps.go.id
Bintarto, R. (1989). Interaksi desa–kota dan permasalahannya. Ghalia Indonesia.
Brown, G., & Kyttä, M. (2014). Key issues and priorities in participatory mapping: Toward integration or increased specialization? Applied Geography, 50, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.01.002
Chambers, R. (2006). Participatory mapping and geographic information systems: Whose map? Who is empowered and who disempowered? Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 25(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2006.tb00163.x
Goodchild, M. F. (2007). Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 69(4), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-007-9111-y
Kementerian Dalam Negeri Republik Indonesia. (2016). Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 45 Tahun 2016 tentang Pedoman Penetapan dan Penegasan Batas Desa (Berita Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2016 Nomor 1038). https://peraturan.go.id/files/bn1038-2016.pdf
Listiana, H., Maulidy, A. F., Eza, A. M., Karomah, D., Srikandi, R., & Aminah, S. (2023). Optimalisasi pengembangan batas dusun sebagai langkah kritis dalam pengelolaan wilayah Ponteh Galis Pamekasan. Welfare: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 1(4). https://jurnalfebi.iainkediri.ac.id/index.php/Welfare/article/download/658/430/3150
McCall, M. K., & Dunn, C. E. (2012). Geo-information tools for participatory spatial planning: Fulfilling the criteria for “good” governance? Geoforum, 43(1), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.07.007
Mustofa, Suherdiyanto, Cahyaningrum, W., Veriansyah, I., & Nurhakim, I. (2026). Pemetaan partisipatif wilayah administrasi RW di Kelurahan Kota Baru, Kota Pontianak. Beru'-beru': Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, 60–69. https://doi.org/10.31605/jipm.6974
Pemerintah Kabupaten Banyumas. (2025). Peraturan Bupati Banyumas Nomor 66 Tahun 2025 tentang Batas Kelurahan Karangwangkal Kecamatan Purwokerto Utara. https://jnnqvmfhkqwfdlzevfao.supabase.co/Republik Indonesia. (2014). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah.
Sejati, A. W., Wijaya, M. I. H., Rahmawaty, M. A., Buchori, I., Basuki, Y., Wahyono, H., Muzaki, A. J., Pradipta, H. T., & Wiratmaja, I. G. (2023). Reducing rural boundary conflict through participatory mapping and GNSS-GIS. In Geospatial science for smart land management: An Asian context (pp. 204–219). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003349518-17 Universitas Diponegoro
Tuladhar, A. M., de Zeeuw, K., & van der Molen, P. (2005). Boundary disputes and participatory mapping in customary lands. Land Use Policy, 22(4), 339–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.06.005
Wehrmann, B. (2008). Land conflicts: A practical guide to dealing with land disputes. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ).
.png)
